On the possibility of a realist pedagogical constructivism

Main Article Content

Abstract

The discussion about the ability of our intelligence to access reality in itself remains one of the oldest and most exciting questions in philosophy. Piaget revolutionized the history of psychology and pedagogy from his scientific discoveries regarding the understanding of the process of knowledge. However, due to his own philosophical inclination, his pedagogical constructivism remained strongly rooted in an immanentist philosophical tradition, to such an extent that the association between pedagogical constructivism and anti-realism constitutes a kind of commonplace and a certain dogmatic assumption. The truth is that this association is not the only possible alternative and, to a certain extent, it does not even seem to fully respond to the ultimate principles or consequences of Piaget's constructivist findings. It is possible to justify pedagogical constructivism from realistic positions, as long as we reconsider some assumptions that modernity has installed in educational and philosophical circles in an uncritical way. The revision of the notion of representation, conceived according to the Aristotelian tradition and updated by the contributions of constructivism, allows to find a pathway of reconciliation between pedagogical constructivism and a kind of realism that be, at the same time, robust and plural.

Article Details

Section
Miscellaneous

References

Alcalá, Ramón Román

“Ni realismo, ni anti-realismo: el escepticismo como raíz del constructivismo filosófico”. ÉNDOXA: Series Filosóficas, n.o 38, 2016, pp. 75-95. Madrid: UNED.

Alford, Brad y Beck, Aaron

The integrative Power of Cognitive Therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

Ballantyne, Nathan

“Epistemic Trespassing”. Mind, Vol. 128. 510. April 2019. doi:10.1093/mind/fzx042.

Barrio Maestre, José María

“Las bases gnoseológicas de las modernas teorías sobre el aprendizaje. Una interpretación crítica del paradigma constructivista”. Revista de Educación, 321 (2000), pp. 351- 370.

Bellomo, Santiago

Lenguaje, libertad, verdad. El realismo expresivo de Charles Taylor. Pamplona: EUNSA.

Dreyfus, Richard y Taylor, Charles.

Recuperar el realismo. Madrid: Rialp.

Garber, Didu

“Reflexiones en torno a Sobre la certeza de Wittgenstein: fundacionalismo, conocimiento y certeza”. Revista de Filosofía, 57, 2007-3, pp. 7 – 51. ISSN 0798-1171

García, Rolando

“Prefacio”. Piaget, Jean. Introducción a la Epistemología Genética. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

El conocimiento en construcción. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Gilson, Etienne

El realismo metódico. Madrid: Rialp. Tercera edición.

La unidad de la experiencia filosófica. Madrid: Rialp.

Llano, Alejandro

El enigma de la representación. Madrid: Síntesis.

Meyer, Catherine

Los nuevos Psi. Lo que hoy sabemos sobre la mente humana. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.

Millán Puelles, Antonio

El enigma de la representación. Comentario sobre un libro de Alejandro Llano. Revista de filosofía. 3ª. Época. Vol. XI (1999), núm. 22, pp. 282-298.

NAGEL, Thomas

Una visión desde ningún lugar, México: FCE.

Piaget, Jean

Six etudes de psychologie. Edición en castellano: 1993. Seis estudios de psicología. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta.

Sabiduría e ilusiones de la filosofía. Barcelona: Península. Primera edición.

Pieper, Joseph

“El elemento negativo en la filosofía de Santo Tomás de Aquino”. Creaturidad y tradición. Buenos Aires: FADES, pp. 29-39.

RORTY, Richard

Understanding and Social Inquiry, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

“Taylor and Dreyfus, «A Discussion»”. Review of Metaphysics, 34 (1980).

“Review: Taylor on Self-Celebration and Gratitude”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 1994.

“Taylor on Truth”. James Tully (ed.), Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995 (reprinted), pp. 20-33.

Verdad y progreso. Escritos filosóficos. Barcelona: Paidós,

Taylor, Charles

a. “Theories of Meaning”. Philosophical Papers 1. Human Agency and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

b. “The Pre-Objective World”. Review of Metahysics. 12. pp 108-132

“Rorty in the Epistemological Tradition”. Alan Malachowski (ed.), Reading Rorty. Critical Responses to Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (and Beyond), Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990 (reprinted 1991), pp. 257-275.

Argumentos filosóficos. Barcelona: Paidós.

“Thomism and the Future of Catholic Philosophy”, New Blacfriars, April (1999).

“What´s Wrong with Foundationalism?: Knowledge, Agency, and World”. Mark Wrathall and Jeff Malpas (eds.), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive. Essays in Honour of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Vol. 2, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 115-134.

“Foundationalism and the Inner-Outer Distinction”. Nicholas H. Smith, Reading Mc. Dowell. On Mind and World, London: Routledge, pp. 106-119.

a. “Closed World Structures”. Mark A. Wrathall (ed.), Religion after Metaphysics, London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47-68.

b. “Rorty and Philosophy”. Charles Guignon and David R. Hiley (eds.), Richard Rorty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158-179.

“Merleau-Ponty and the Epistemological Picture”. Taylor Carman and Mark B. N. Hansen (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26-49.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig

Investigaciones filosóficas. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.

Aforismos. Cultura y valor. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.