Quality of textbooks from the knowledge management perspective

Main Article Content

Jozef Hvorecky
Lilla Korenova

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of textbooks. They helped the learners to continue their learning in time of lockdowns. The period also raised a question: What features has to have a textbook to support learning in learner’s full or partial isolation? The objective is to identify textbook’s concepts and style leading to the isolated learner’s outcomes equivalent to those in-classroom education. The methodology has a qualitative approach; we confront subjects’ learning objectives and textbooks’ content, in particular, the presence of relevant explicit and tacit knowledge. Explicit knowledge is always present because it consists of texts, illustrations, etc. Authors may forget about or occasionally neglect tacit knowledge: best practices and heuristics. The learners then cannot receive their subject’s holistic knowledge, because they are unable to complete mental lifts between Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy’s levels. As results key features of mental lifts are identified. Based on them, strategies helping to balance explicit and tacit knowledge necessary for achieving subject’s learning objectives are provided. The appropriateness of the balancing strategies is discoursed using examples from two distant subjects: Poetry and Geometry. In a stepwise manner, these examples address all mental lifts and show how such sequences can expand the learner’s knowledge. To conclude the discussion demonstrated the suitability of exploiting complete sets of mental lifts. The authors can use it to make certain that no relevant tacit knowledge will absent in their materials.

Article Details

Section
MISCELLANEOUS SECTION

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing, Abridged Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon,

Barrows, H. S., Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: theory and practice. New Directions For Teaching and Learning Series, 68, 3-11.

Bednárik, M., ?okyna, J., Ostertágová, A., Rehúš, M.: Ako?v ?ase krízy zabezpe?i? prístup k vzdelávaniu pre všetky deti. Inštitút vzdelávacej politiky, 2020, 24 pp.

https://www.ozskolstva.sk/files/korona%20opatrenia%20komentar_final.pdf

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl. D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Caroll, L. (1865). Alice’s Advantures in Wonderland, Macmillan, London.

Clark, D. (2004). Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains.

http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

Chamovitz, D. (2017). What a plant knows: A field Guide to the senses. Farrar, Straus and Giraux, New York.

Dávideková, M., Hvorecký, J. (2017). ICT Collaboration Tools for Virtual Teams in Terms of the SECI Model. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p. 95-116

Eurostat (2021) Individuals – internet use, [Online], Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_ci_ifp_iu/default/bar?lang=en

Harrison, R. (2009). Learning and Development. Chartered Inst of Pers/Develop, 5th Edition.

Hug, T. (2007). Didactics of Microlearning. Waxmann Verlag, New York, 2007, 419 pp.

Hvorecký, J. (2018). Me?avce: Ve?ký tresk. Raabe, Bratislava

Hvorecký, J., Kore?ová, L. (2018). Learning Critical Thinking without Teacher’s Presence. Proceedings of 12th International Scientific Conference on Distance Learning in Applied Informatics, pp. 293-302

Hvorecký, J., Šimúth, J., Lichardus, B. (2013). Managing Rational and Not-Fully-Rational Knowledge. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 121-132

Jordan, Z., & Karunananthan, S. (2020). The hardest thing about learning is unlearning: why systematic review replication should be reconsidered. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(11), 2194-2195.

Knuchel, C, (2004). Teaching Symmetry in the Elementary Curriculum, The Mathematics Enthusiast: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1001

Love, P. E., Smith, J., & Teo, P. (2018). Putting into practice error management theory: unlearning and learning to manage action errors in construction. Applied ergonomics, 69, 104-111.

Majewski, M. (2011). Geometric ornaments in Istanbul. In Proceedings of the 16th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 19-23).

Meriam-Webster Dictionary: Quality. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quality

Kimiz Dalkir (2017) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. The MIT Press, 552 pp.

Lord, T., & Baviskar, S. (2007). Moving students from information recitation to information understanding-Exploiting Bloom's Taxonomy in creating science questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 40.

Meriam-Webster: Symmetry. Symmetry Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster (naoxinkang.com)

Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company – How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, London.

Nilssen, J. H. (2015). The challenge of raising the quality of the textbook and its companion website–Just when is less more?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 164-168.

Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. (2018), Insektenes planet – Om de rare, nyttige og fascinerende småkrypene vi ikke kan leve uten, Stilton Literary Agency.

Wikipedia: Tacit knowledge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacit_knowledge

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s taxonomy revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy.