Optimizing Structural Integrity of Fighter Aircraft Wing Stations: a Finite Element Analysis Approach

Main Article Content

Aun Haider Bhutta

Abstract

Modern fighter aircraft are equipped with multiple stations on the fuselage and under the wings to accommodate various external stores, both jettisonable and non-jettisonable. Each configuration undergoes airworthiness certification, including structural analysis of individual stations within the carriage flight envelope. This study focuses on the structural analysis of a fighter aircraft wing station within this specified envelope. To perform this analysis, the wing station is extracted from the comprehensive global wing model, creating a sub-model with equivalent stiffness properties. Utilizing ANSYS Workbench®, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is conducted for critical load cases to determine the Factor of Safety (FoS). The initial analysis reveals that the wing station has an FoS of 1.2 under the maximum design load. Prestressed modal and buckling analyses indicate a 10% increase in stiffness due to stress-stiffening effects. To further enhance load-carrying capacity, parametric design changes are introduced. Increasing the bolt diameter from 8 mm to 10 mm raises the FoS to 1.33, resulting in an 8% increase in the maximum load-carrying capacity of the wing station. This comprehensive approach, employing FEA, ensures the wing’s structural integrity under static load conditions within the carriage envelope. The study's findings support the wing station's enhanced performance and contribute to safer and more efficient aircraft operations.

Article Details

Section
Scientific Paper

References

K. Sinha, T. Klimmek, M. Schulze, and V. Handojo, “Loads analysis and structural optimization of a high aspect ratio, composite wing aircraft,” CEAS Aeronautical Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 233–243, Apr 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00494-x

B. D. Upadhyay, S. S. Sonigra, and S. D. Daxini, “Numerical analysis perspective in structural shape optimization: A review post 2000,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 155, p. 102992, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2021.102992

N. Zimmermann and P. H. Wang, “A review of failure modes and fracture analysis of aircraft composite materials,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 115, p. 104692, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104692

R. L. Muhanna and S. Shahi, Uncertainty in Boundary Conditions—An Interval Finite Element Approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 157–167. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40814-5_20

T. Martins, V. Infante, L. Sousa, A. Fonseca, P. Antunes, A. Moura, and B. Serrano, “Numerical and experimental study of aircraft structural health,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 132, p. 105348, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105348

J. Lim, C. You, and I. Dayyani, “Multi-objective topology optimization and structural analysis of periodic spaceframe structures,” Materials & Design, vol. 190, p. 108552, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108552

C. Touzé, A. Vizzaccaro, and O. Thomas, “Model order reduction methods for geometrically nonlinear structures: a review of nonlinear techniques,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 1141–1190, Jul 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06693-9

C. You, M. Yasaee, S. He, D. Yang, Y. Xu, I. Dayyani, H. Ghasemnejad, S. Guo, P. Webb, J. Jennings, and G. Federico, “Identification of the key design inputs for the fem-based preliminary sizing and mass estimation of a civil aircraft wing box structure,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 121, p. 107284, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107284

A. Haider Bhutta, “Appropriate boundary condition for finite element analysis of structural members isolated from global model,” NED University Journal of Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 61–75, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35453/NEDJR-STMECH-2021-0001

E. Narvydas, N. Puodziuniene, and T. A. khan, “Application of finite element sub-modeling techniques in structural mechanics,” Mechanika, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 459–464, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.25962

J. Jang and S. Ahn, “Fe modeling methodology for load analysis and preliminary sizing of aircraft wing structure,” International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1301

A. Mishra, S. Pal, G. Singh Malhi, and P. Singh, “Structural analysis of uav airframe by using fem techniques: A review,” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, vol. 29, pp. 195–204, 06 2020. [Online]. Available: https://is.gd/4NRfx9

S. Henclik and A. Maurin, “Determination of the stiffness matrix of flat springs for modeling of the boundary condition at a pipeline support,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 123, pp. 102–116, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.047

M. d. C. Alves, F. N. Corrêa, J. R. M. de Sousa, and B. P. Jacob, “A coupled, global/local finite element methodology to evaluate the fatigue life of flexible risers attached to floating platforms for deepwater offshore oil production,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 8, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12081231

V. Karnozov, “China’s fighter aircraft detailed,” Defence Review Asia, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://is.gd/dM2DHD

A. G. Manca and C. M. Pappalardo, “Topology optimization procedure of aircraft mechanical components based on computer-aided design, multibody dynamics, and finite element analysis,” in Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing III, V. Ivanov, I. Pavlenko, O. Liaposhchenko, J. Machado, and M. Edl, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 159–168. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50491-5_16

A. Aabid, M. A. M. B. M. Zakuan, S. A. Khan, and Y. E. Ibrahim, “Structural analysis of three-dimensional wings using finite element method,” Aerospace Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47–63, Mar 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-021-00114-w

P. Wang, Y. Chen, R. Pei, C. Lian, K. Zhang, and Y. Zhou, “Buckling and post-buckling analysis of composite wing box under loads with torsion-bending coupling,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 193, p. 111266, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111266

N. Yang, “Methodology of aircraft structural design optimisation,” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology (IJCAT), vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 145–154, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2022.130874

A. Basutkar, K. Baruah, and S. K. Kudari, “Frequency analysis of aircraft wing using FEM,” in Recent Trends in Mechanical Engineering, G. S. V. L. Narasimham, A. V. Babu, S. S. Reddy, and R. Dhanasekaran, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 527–533. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1124-0_46

B. Ravi Kumar, “Investigation on buckling response of the aircraft’s wing using finite-element method,” Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 18, no. sup1, pp. S122–S131, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034818

S. De, M. Jrad, and R. K. Kapania, “Structural optimization of internal structure of aircraft wings with curvilinear spars and ribs,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 707–718, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034818