Quantitative analysis of crop richness and monoculture adoption in Ecuador
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In tropical countries, traditional production systems have proved to be fairly productive whereas having a lower environmental impact than conventional agriculture. Nevertheless, factors such as the penetration of the market economy and the disruption of commercial agriculture are reported to have negative effects on agrodiversity of traditional systems. This paper analyzes the socioeconomic determinants of crop richness and monocropping among Ecuadorian farmers. Using data from the Living Standards Measurement Survey-2014, multivariate techniques were used to assess the factors influencing decisions on how many crops to grow and on the likelihood of adopting monocropping. The results show that the number of crops a household grows is larger for poor large indigenous households. In contrast, crop richness is smaller for more educated households receiving off farm income and residing near a road. In terms of which kind of household is the most likely to engage in monocropping, this is a household that has off-farm work, uses pesticides, and is located next to a road. On the other hand, poor indigenous households have less odds to adopt monoculture. These results demonstrate the importance of diversified agrosystems for rural people in Ecuador and reflect that policy makers should focus on the rescue and promotion of traditional agrosystems as a way to reach food security while promoting sustainable agriculture.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana of Ecuador preserves the copyrights of the published works and will favor the reuse of the works. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution/Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Ecuador license: works can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed.
The undersigned author partially transfers the copyrights of this work to Universidad Politécnica Salesiana of Ecuador for the printed edition.
References
Abdoellah, O.S., Hadikusumah, H.Y., Takeuchi, K. y Okubo, S. (2006) ‘Commercialisation of homegardens in an indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes’, en Tropical homegardens. Springer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-7475-x
Abebe, T. (2013) ‘Determinants of crop diversity and composition in enset-coffee agroforestry homegardens of southern ethiopia’, Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 114, pp. 29–38.
Abril Saltos, R.V., Ruíz Vásquez, T.E., Lazo, J.A., Viáfara Banguera, D., Ríos Guayasamín, P.D., Aguinda Vargas, J.K. y Vega Peñas, I. (2016) ‘The use of medicinal plants by rural populations of the pastaza province in the ecuadorian amazon’, Acta Amazonica, 46, pp. 355–366. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201600305
Altieri, M.A. (2002) ‘Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93, pp. 1–24. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00085-3
Altieri, M.A. (2009) ‘Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty’, Monthly Review, 61, pp. 102–113. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-061-03-2009-07_8
Altieri, M.A., Funes-Monzote, F.R. y Petersen, P. (2012) ‘Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty’, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, pp. 1–13. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0065-6
Angelsen, A. y Kaimowitz, D. (2001) ‘Introduction: the role of agricultural technologies in tropical deforestation’, en Angelsen, A. y Kaimowitz, D. (eds.) Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. London: CABI.
Astier, M., Argueta, J.Q., Orozco-Ramírez, Q., González, M.V., Morales, J., Gerritsen, P.R., … Martínez Saldaña, T. (2017) ‘Back to the roots: understanding current agroecological movement, science, and practice in mexico’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 41, pp. 329–348. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1287809
BCE (2019) Evolución de la balanza comercial enero – octubre 2019 (Inf. Téc.). Quito, Ecuador: Banco Central del Ecuador. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/mf45b
Bilsborrow, R.E., Barbieri, A.F. y Pan, W. (2004) ‘Changes in population and land use over time in the ecuadorian amazon’, Acta Amazonica, 34, pp. 635–647. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672004000400015
Brassel, F., Ruiz, P. y Zapatta, A. (2010) ‘La estructura agraria en el ecuador: una aproximación a su problemática y tendencias’, en Reforma agraria en el ecuador. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/o0n53x
Chayanov, A. (1966) The theory of peasant economy. Homewood, Illinois: The American Economic Association.
Comoretto, L., Arfib, B., Talva, R., Chauvelon, P., Pichaud, M., Chiron, S. y Höhener, P. (2008) ‘Runoff of pesticides from rice fields in the ile de camargue (rhône river delta, france): Field study and modeling’, Environmental Pollution, 151, pp. 486–493. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.04.021
Coq-Huelva, D., Higuchi, A., Alfalla-Luque, R., Burgos-Morán, R. y Arias-Gutiérrez, R. (2017) ‘Co-evolution and bio-social construction: The kichwa agroforestry systems (chakras) in the ecuadorian amazonia’, Sustainability, 9, 1920. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101920
Coq-Huelva, D., Torres-Navarrete, B. y Bueno-Suárez, C. (2018) ‘Indigenous worldviews and western conventions: Sumak kawsay and cocoa production in ecuadorian amazonia’, Agriculture and Human Values, 35, pp. 163–179. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9812-x
FAO (2021) Ecuador en una mirada. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/3a4zx
Fatch, P.F., Masangano, C., Kamoto, J., Jordan, I., Hilger, T., Mambo, I., … Nuppenau, E.-A. (2020) ‘Are farmer perceptions among significant determinants of adoption of agricultural diversity in malawi? a case of lilongwe district’, Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 121, pp. 277–288.
Gortaire, R. (2016) ‘Agroecología en el ecuador. proceso histórico, logros, y desafíos’, Antropología: Cuadernos de Investigación, pp. 12–38. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/q80ic
Gray, C.L. (2009) ‘Rural out-migration and smallholder agriculture in the southern ecuadorian andes’, Population and Environment, 30, pp. 193–217. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0081-5
Heynig, K. (1982) ‘Principales enfoques sobre la economía campesina’, Revista de la CEPAL, 16, pp. 115–142. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/1arxpe
Hofstede, R., Lips, J. y Jogsma, W. (1998) Geografía, ecología y forestación de la sierra alta del ecuador: Revisión de literatura. Quito, Ecuador: Abya-Yala.
Holt-Giménez, E. y Altieri, M.A. (2013) ‘Agroecology, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, pp. 90–102. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.716388
INEC (2010) Censo de población y vivienda (Inf. Téc.). Quito, Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/hd1t
INEC (2014) Metodología de la encuesta de condiciones de vida (ecv) 2013-2014 (Inf. Téc.). Quito, Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/nh8x
INEC (2021) Boletín técnico encuesta de superficie y producción agropecuaria continua (espac), 2020 (Inf. Téc.). Quito, Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/89lq7
Intriago, R., Gortaire Amézcua, R., Bravo, E. y O’Connell, C. (2017) ‘Agroecology in ecuador: historical processes, achievements, and challenges’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 41, pp. 311–328. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1284174
Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., Geist, H.J., Agbola, S.B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J.W., … Folke, C. (2001) ‘The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths’, Global Environmental Change, 11, pp. 261–269. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
MAE (2013) Sistema de clasificación de los ecosistemas del ecuador continental (Inf. Téc.). Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/6y7dy
Nuckolls, J.B. (2010) Lessons from a quechua strongwoman: Ideophony, dialogue, and perspective. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Ongley, E.D., Xiaolan, Z. y Tao, Y. (2010) ‘Current status of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution assessment in china’, Environmental Pollution, 158, pp. 1159–1168. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.047
Parraguez-Vergara, E., Contreras, B., Clavijo, N., Villegas, V., Paucar, N. y Ther, F. (2018) ‘Does indigenous and campesino traditional agriculture have anything to contribute to food sovereignty in latin america? evidence from chile, peru, ecuador, colombia, guatemala and mexico’, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16, pp. 326–341. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1489361
Perrault-Archambault, M. y Coomes, O.T. (2008) ‘Distribution of agrobiodiversity in home gardens along the corrientes river, peruvian amazon’, Economic Botany, 62, pp. 109–126. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9010-2
Sellers, S., Bilsborrow, R., Salinas, V. y Mena, C. (2017) ‘Population and development in the amazon: A longitudinal study of migrant settlers in the northern ecuadorian amazon’, Acta Amazonica, 47, pp. 321–330. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201602663
Torres, B., Maza, O., Aguirre, P., Hinojosa, L. y Günter, S. (2015) ‘The contribution of traditional agroforestry to climate change adaptation in the ecuadorian amazon: The chakra system’, en Handbook of climate change adaptation (pp. 1973–1994). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.234
Torres, B., Vasco, C., Günter, S. y Knoke, T. (2018) ‘Determinants of agricultural diversification in a hotspot area: evidence from colonist and indigenous communities in the sumaco biosphere reserve, ecuadorian amazon’, Sustainability, 10, 1432. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051432
Vasco, C., Tafur, V., Valdiviezo, R., Hernández, H. y Caisaguano, L. (2021) ‘Determinantes socioeconómicos de la agrodiversidad y el monocultivo en la provincia de esmeraldas’, Ciencia y Tecnología, 14, pp. 37–44. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18779/cyt.v14i1.457
Vasco, C., Tamayo, G. y Griess, V. (2017) ‘The drivers of market integration among indigenous peoples: Evidence from the ecuadorian amazon’, Society & Natural Resources, 30, pp. 1212–1228. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1331487
Vasco, C. y Tamayo, G.N. (2017) ‘Determinants of non-farm employment and non-farm earnings in ecuador’, CEPAL Review, 121, pp. 53–67. Disponible en: https://n9.cl/kb044
Vasco, C., Torres, B., Jácome, E., Torres, A., Eche, D. y Velasco, C. (2021) ‘Use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in frontier areas: A case study in the northern ecuadorian amazon’, Land Use Policy, 107, 105490. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105490
Vasco, C., Torres, B., Pacheco, P. y Griess, V. (2017) ‘The socioeconomic determinants of legal and illegal smallholder logging: Evidence from the ecuadorian amazon’, Forest Policy and Economics, 78, pp. 133–140. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.015
Vasco Pérez, C., Bilsborrow, R. y Torres, B. (2015) ‘Income diversification of migrant colonists vs. indigenous populations: Contrasting strategies in the amazon’, Journal of Rural Studies, 42, pp. 1–10. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.003
Wikle, C.K. (2003) ‘Hierarchical models in environmental science’, International Statistical Review, 71, pp. 181–199. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1403883
Wunder, S. (2001) ‘Ecuador goes bananas: incremental technological change and forest loss’, en Angelsen, A. y Kaimowitz, D. (eds.) Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. CABI.