Implementation and evaluation of a wheeled-legged locomotion robot for optimizing the preflight air intake inspection protocol of fighter aircraft

Main Article Content

Mayki Mamani
Jhonathan Uchamaco
David Meneses
Yuri Silva
Jorge Apaza

Abstract

Maintenance and inspection protocols in the aerospace industry are designed to safeguard the structural integrity of aircraft and ensure pilot safety. However, the air intakes of fighter aircraft pose significant access challenges for maintenance technicians during preflight inspections. To address this limitation, this study presents an innovative solution: the implementation and evaluation of a robot equipped with a wheeled-legged locomotion system. This system enables efficient access to the air intakes, significantly enhancing the inspection protocol. The robot was developed in close alignment with the operational requirements of Peruvian Air Force (FAP) technicians, which was critical to defining its design specifications and manufacturing parameters. Its adaptive and compact architecture allows it to navigate confined intake structures effectively, optimizing inspection time and resource utilization. The prototype’s performance was rigorously assessed through standardized tests, demonstrating its capability to reliably access and inspect air intakes under preflight conditions. This advancement contributes to the modernization of conventional aircraft maintenance procedures by integrating robotic technologies into the aeronautical inspection process.

Article Details

Section
Scientific Paper

References

V. Madonna, P. Giangrande, and M. Galea, “Electrical power generation in aircraft: Review, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 646–659, Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2018.2834142

A. V. Chatzi, “Safety management systems: an opportunity and a challenge for military aviation organisations,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 190–196, Jan. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-05-2018-0146

Y. D. Yasuda, F. A. Cappabianco, L. E. G. Martins, and J. A. Gripp, “Aircraft visual inspection: A systematic literature review,” Computers in Industry, vol. 141, p. 103695, Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103695

T. Chauhan, C. Goyal, D. Kumari, and A. K. Thakur, “A review on foreign object debris/damage (fod) and its effects on aviation industry,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, pp. 4336–4339, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.457

K. K. R. Yadav, A. R. Paul, A. Jain, and F. Alam, “Effects of synthetic jets on swirl inflow in a variable-geometry twin air-intake,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1193–1225, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-023-00481-8

M. Maddox, Human Factors Guide for Aviation Maintenance. Washington, DC: Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://upsalesiana.ec/ing34ar10r1

M. Tsakalerou, D. Nurmaganbetov, and N. Beltenov, “Aircraft maintenance 4.0 in an era of disruptions,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 200, pp. 121–131, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.211

D. Xie, M. Xu, and H. Dai, “Effects of damage parametric changes on the aeroelastic behaviors of a damaged panel,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 1035–1050, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05029-y

S. Bowling, S. Kaewkuekool, M. Khasawneh, R. Desai, and K. Gramopadhye, “Confined space work in aircraft maintenance industry: Scope for improving safety and reducing errors,” 05 2002. [Online]. Available: https://upsalesiana.ec/ing34ar10r9

M. Verhoeff, W. Verhagen, and R. Curran, “Maximizing operational readiness in military aviation by optimizing flight and maintenance planning,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 10, pp. 941–950, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.048

S. Fu and N. P. Avdelidis, “Prognostic and health management of critical aircraft systems and components: An overview,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8124, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198124

M. Siegel, P. Gunatilake, and G. Podnar, “Robotic assistants for aircraft inspectors,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 389–400, Dec. 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/01439919810240234

Y. Zhang, P. Li, J. Quan, L. Li, G. Zhang, and D. Zhou, “Progress, challenges, and prospects of soft robotics for space applications,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200071

A. H. Alami, A. Ghani Olabi, A. Alashkar, S. Alasad, H. Aljaghoub, H. Rezk, and M. A. Abdelkareem, “Additive manufacturing in the aerospace and automotive industries: Recent trends and role in achieving sustainable development goals,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 102516, Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102516

J. S. Bennett, B. E. Vyhnalek, H. Greenall, E. M. Bridge, F. Gotardo, S. Forstner, G. I. Harris, F. A. Miranda, and W. P. Bowen, “Precision magnetometers for aerospace applications: A review,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 16, p. 5568, Aug. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165568

D. A. Rodríguez, C. Lozano Tafur, P. F. Melo Daza, J. A. Villalba Vidales, and J. C. Daza Rincón, “Inspection of aircrafts and airports using uas: A review,” Results in Engineering, vol. 22, p. 102330, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102330

M. Kaur Dhoot, I.-S. Fan, and Z. Skaf, “Review of robotic systems for aircraft inspection,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718054

J. Shang, T. Sattar, S. Chen, and B. Bridge, “Design of a climbing robot for inspecting aircraft wings and fuselage,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 495–502, Oct. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01439910710832093

M. Fujita, S. Ikeda, T. Fujimoto, T. Shimizu, S. Ikemoto, and T. Miyamoto, “Development of universal vacuum gripper for wall-climbing robot,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 283–296, Mar. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2018.1447238

Y. L. Silva Vidal, E. D. Supo Colquehuanca, D. F. Meneses Huanca, E. J. Valdeiglesias Flores, F. J. Uchamaco Noa, J. A. Guevara Mamani, J. L. Apaza Gutierrez, and G. W. Galdos Alvarez, “Analysis of robotics applied to mobility in the air intakes of a fighter aircraft,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 937–947, Dec. 2022, [En línea]. [Online]. Available: https://upsalesiana.ec/ing34ar10r20

D. M. Helevera, Visual examinations and manual checks to determine the condition of an aircraft and its component. National Aviation University, Ukraine, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://upsalesiana.ec/ing34ar10r21

S. Kumar Thukaram, Robot based 3D welding for jet engine blade repair and rapid prototyping of small components. University of Manitoba, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://upsalesiana.ec/ing34ar10r22

R. M. Groves, 3.12 Inspection and Monitoring of Composite Aircraft Structures. Elsevier, 2018, pp. 300–311. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10340-6

M. Bjelonic, V. Klemm, J. Lee, and M. Hutter, A Survey of Wheeled-Legged Robots. Springer International Publishing, Aug. 2022, pp. 83–94. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15226-9_11

T. Klamt, D. Rodriguez, M. Schwarz, C. Lenz, D. Pavlichenko, D. Droeschel, and S. Behnke, “Supervised autonomous locomotion and manipulation for disaster response with a centaur-like robot,” in 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, Oct. 2018, pp. 1–8. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594509

G. Endo and S. Hirose, “Study on rollerwalker — improvement of locomotive efficiency of quadruped robots by passive wheels,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 26, no. 8–9, pp. 969–988, May 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1163/156855312X633066

J. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Yu, Y. Guan, Y. Zhao, Z. Zhuang, and T. Sun, “Design, analysis, and experiment of a wheel-legged mobile robot,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9936, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179936

J. Niu, H. Wang, Z. Jiang, L. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Feng, and S. Guo, “Kinematic analysis of a serial-parallel hybrid mechanism and its application to a wheel-legged robot,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 111 931–111 944, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001653

F. Raza, W. Zhu, and M. Hayashibe, “Balance stability augmentation for wheel-legged biped robot through arm acceleration control,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 54 022–54 031, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071055

Y. Xin, H. Chai, Y. Li, X. Rong, B. Li, and Y. Li, “Speed and acceleration control for a two wheelleg robot based on distributed dynamic model and whole-body control,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 180 630–180 639, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959333

V. S. Medeiros, E. Jelavic, M. Bjelonic, R. Siegwart, M. A. Meggiolaro, and M. Hutter, “Trajectory optimization for wheeled-legged quadrupedal robots driving in challenging terrain,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4172–4179, Jul. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2990720

H. Peng, J. Wang, S. Wang, W. Shen, D. Shi, and D. Liu, “Coordinated motion control for a wheel-leg robot with speed consensus strategy,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, pp. 1–1, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2020.2975083